I wish I used more graphics in my writing; unfortunately, I usually think of them as an afterthought. It’s very difficult for me to think of graphics as I compose, even when stumbling through a section that could benefit from a visual representation. I tend to think in words, not in pictures. However, this chapter presents a great overview/reminder of the type of graphics we might find useful in our proposals, and some of the suggested types will probably find their way into my thesis rather than my thesis proposal, though I intend to check my sources for any graphics that I might adapt to my methodology section. This section is the densest part of my proposal, and a graphic could do a lot to explain and elaborate on my plan. I will also consider inserting a screenshot of an example profile, though I believe at this stage the graphic would take up more space than it is worth.
I also think it is important to consider the flow of the proposal, since graphics can both enhance and interrupt this flow. For readers who will most likely skim or selectively read the proposal a graphic can display information in a concise space; break up the text; and restate main points, since it never hurts to say things more than once, in different ways of course. Thus, the graphics will need to be integrated into the proposal with the same quality or ethics as the writing style.
Furthermore, we need to make certain to label all areas of graphics in as much detail as the space allows. As the chapter suggests, we should label x- and y-axes and use callouts to specify important features. In a previous course, I learned that labels appear below figures and above tables (tabletop is an easy way to remember this distinction), and in conjunction with the previous chapter, I believe such consistency will support the overall design of our document.
